Check This Out...

12.11.2006

How TNA Should and Shouldn't Combat WWE

THE FOLLOWING IS A GUEST ARTICLE SUBMITTED BY O-STER: THE HITMAN

Anyone who has been watching TNA since its debut on Spike TV knows that they love to take shots at Vince McMahon and his WWE empire. And they're not even subtle shots!

The knocks on WWE are both frequent and obvious. While this would seem like it could be a good idea, McMahon always seems to be one step ahead. Need proof?

Last July, Rhino came out and publicly attacked McMahon's plan for a new ECW. He claimed that ECW would be nothing without its last champion...himself. McMahon then decided to piss all over the legacy of ECW by putting his own 'spin' on it. So much for Rhino being proud of the old ECW days.

DX has also been a favourite target of TNA. The X-Division t-shirt was their first shot at them. More recently, and more notably, the Voodoo Kin Mafia have spent all of their TV time trying to defame the sophomoric antics of DX rather than wrestle.

Did it work? Just watch last week's edition of "Raw" again for the answer to that. No jokes, no hijinks, no typical DX. Instead, they ran a worked shoot, trying to show a more serious side of the duo. So much for Brian and Monty doing anything to scare WWE.

TNA has always loved to pride itself on having original matches. They love to tout their Ultimate X and Six Sides of Steel bouts as innovative and edgy gimmick matches...which they are. But has anybody noticed the sharp rise in gimmick matches in WWE as of late? Albeit, they like to use them quite frequently anyway, but Armageddon will mark the second time in the last four months that a pay-per-view has featured multiple gimmick matches. And, just like TNA's specialties, they are matches that only WWE uses.

Lastly, I don't care what any dissenters say, I don't even care that Joe himself disagreed with it - Umaga is an obvious swipe at the Samoan Submission Machine. Samoans, as a whole, tend to get more pushes than pretty much any other ethnic group (excluding whites, but that's only because the wrestling scene is predominantly Caucasian), but the timing and the way Umaga's character has played out is just too similar to Joe's to simply blow it off as coincidence.

Don't kid yourself, WWE is very aware that TNA poses a potential threat. They're just trying to be as subtle as they can about showing it. Any attention drawn to the competition is a very bad thing at this point, especially with Cena being constantly shoved down the throats of fans.

So the question for TNA now is, if WWE has been able to counter all of TNA's attempts to bring them down, where do they go from here? Quite simply, they must use a different battle plan. Instead of taking blatant shots at what WWE is doing right, they should capitalize on the E's mistakes from the past. They've already done this somewhat, by signing Rhino, Christian Cage and Kurt Angle (it would seem that they are using him sparingly enough for him to be able to maintain his health) and putting them to immediate use.

But there's still more they can do. With many disgruntled superstars in ECW, the writing seems to be on the wall. There may be superstars walking very soon, and TNA would love to snatch up guys like RVD (although probably not very likely) or Sandman (more likely) in a heartbeat. Lance Storm isn't doing anything these days; he could be a huge pickup.

Same with Jericho, provided they don't offer him an insulting salary like they once did previously. Even bigger would be picking up a guy like Brock Lesnar or even Goldberg (if used right, a lot of marks may start to tune in on Thursday nights). Plain and simple, WWE has made the most of angry superstars that TNA has screwed over, so why shouldn't TNA do the same?

WWE has dropped the ball on a lot of talent over the years, and there's consequently a gold mine sitting around in indie limbo. TNA just needs to bring in some fresh star power and learn from the mistakes that WCW made, both backstage and storyline-wise, and they could become the legitimate threat that they currently believe they are.


7 comments: on "How TNA Should and Shouldn't Combat WWE"

Anonymous said...

WWE subtle? Not a known trait of the E (as some call it around here)... Actaully the opposite of their M.O.
I think this is a case of reading too much into things... DX was going to pull the "serious" role last week, due to Rated RKO's attack on Flair... though im not in the room with the writers i get the feeling this storyline was written before VKM ever debuted... Flair knew when his court dates were, so they made it work...
And though on paper it seems "clear" that Umaga is a take on Joe... there is no real substance to it... Though AAE would be interesting to see as Joe's manager...
Of course WWE knows TNA is competition... and Vince has to be excited... This is going to work out great for everyone... As long as either brand can introduce a special "IT" factor..

EC said...

Competing with the WWE should be TNA's first priority, but they won't do it by signing "lesser lights" that the WWE buried long ago. Cage, Rhino, Angle, these were all great picks. And the key is to INTEGRATE these guys with their established roster to elevate their homegrown talent. I think the Hardy signing was a waste in that sense, since he did not really elevate anyone on the TNA roster.

The program between Angle and JOE is FANTASTIC! Even is Angle leaves the company tomorrow, JOE has the history now of taking on the "best", (which is always up for discussion).

And PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, get SPIKE to give TNA a TWO HOUR show as soon as possible. This is the biggest obstacle to TNA making a sustained run at the WWE. They need the time to put someone on TV besides STING trying the conversion gimmick, and guys shaking hands trying to be friends. If they get two hours, they have the content to put on great promos AND great wrestling with their roster.

That is the best way to attack the WWE, since the WWE doesn't really let their people work and show what they can do in the ring on a consistent basis. Always another DX promo to squeeze in, you know.

Anonymous said...

When I had said that they should try to pick up past WWE superstars, I probably should have been more clear. I didn't mean to just pick up talentless jobbers that WWE drops, but rather, get the guys who have equaled ratings in the past. Creative dropped the ball on a lot of great talents, and for TNA to pick up guys who are as over or as talented as guys like Angle or Cage could be a huge shot in the arm. Turner almost ran WWE out of business in the 90's by putting former WWE superstars like Savage, Nash, and Hogan to good use (okay, so there's not another Hogan floating around, but you get what I'm getting at). Pick up Lesnar; ever since his football dream fizzled, he hasn't been doing much. Pick up Goldberg; everyone has now seen that he's not too bad when it comes to actually showing emotion in his acting (problem is, no creative team ever wanted him to, they just wanted him as a musclehead). Get guys who WWE marks already know, that will get more of them to tune in. This would also be a great argument to expand TNA from one hour to two.

Yes, I agree that subtlety has never been the E's strong suit, but it would seem that in this case, they're trying to do a lot of damage while making it look like they're not doing anything. That way, fans who don't know about TNA(aka marks) or don't care aren't directly exposed to anything that might pique their curiosity.

Dan-e-o said...

Donnie and I had the opportunity to speak to both Traci Brooks and Robert Roode last week.

They both commented on how difficult it is for TNA to get over as much talent as they'd like in a 41-minute span (An hour minus commercials, of course).

I had an article written about "iMPACT!" needing more than an hour last week but due to our technical difficulties, it didn't get posted.

Thanks to the Hitman for your contribution.

Anonymous said...

That's one thing TNA used to do very well back when they were more obscure. They always billed themselves as the "new face of professional wrestling". They've stopped using that intro as of late, just as they've toned down using that philosophy in their product.

Thanks to everyone who has given some sort of feedback on my article. Hopefully the powers that be on this page will accept future articles of mine.

Anonymous said...

I actually didn't mind BG James when he was part of 3 Live Kru. It wasn't until his old tag team partner showed up that he started getting stuck in lousy storylines. If I were calling the shots there, I might fire Kip James, but I'd keep BG around. At the very least, I would have them drop the God-awful VKM gimmick.

Anonymous said...

Jeff Jarrett over-rated? Camera hog... maybe... but far from over-rated...

As far as VKM, I guess it's all a matter of opinion... the guys are solid in the ring, sure theyre not taking Xdivison-type spots, but who would want to see that? I agree on the "invade wwe" segments,they are cheesy...
but maybe, just maybe we take this business a little more serious than we should; even more than the men and women that dedicate their lives and bodies to it... i find that i seem to enjoy wrestling more when i can tell the entertainers are honestly enjoying themsleves...