Some fans would ask, "how can you criticize one of the greatest champions of the 1990's?" I would respond, "how can you not?"Bret Hart was close to being released when he was lucky enough to be paired with Jim Neidhardt and Jimmy Hart to form the Hart Foundation. They had a successful run as a team that lasted many years, and were one of my favorite childhood tag teams.
Then they split up, and Bret came seemingly out of nowhere to defeat Mr. Perfect for the Intercontinental title at Summerslam. So far so good...
When the steroid trial reared it's ugly head, Bret was in position to change the face of the stereotypical WWE champion. This ushered in a new WWE era.
I will give Bret his due. Bret's successful title run paved the way for the actual WWE wrestling product to get better over the years, and set the stage for many smaller wrestlers to have success. Without Bret carrying the ball, would we have had Chris Jericho and Chris Benoit title runs? It's debatable. We can look back at Bret Hart leading the charge for the "New Generation" and we see a time where WWE business wasn't very impressive. While Bret wasn't offensive as champion, he certainly didn't put the butts in the seats that Hogan did before him and Austin did after...
For me personally, becoming a fan when the Megapowers were sitting on top of the wrestling world, it was hard to support Bret Hart as a World Heavyweight Champion. His defeat of Ric Flair meant no title rematch for Randy Savage. His first title reign would be ended to put the belt back around Hogan's waist, but by the time he had his second reign, it was more than apparant that Hulkamania was either dead or certainly on a long hiatus.
I learned to live with Bret Hart as a World Champion. While I never cared particularly about the stories between Bret and Owen, Hakushi, or Bob Backlund, I knew Bret Hart could produce a great match. I point to his match with the British Bulldog at In Your House as a shining example of what Bret could do in the ring when he had the belt. That match is vastly underated, as most people tend to remember their 1992 Summerslam encounter.
Outside of the ring, I didn't feel like Bret delivered. As a babyface champion, he was boring. I didn't feel that he was the best there is, best there was, or the best their ever would be, and resented him for making the claim.
The WWE groomed Shawn Michaels as a successor to the Hitman. Bret was never happy with the way he was portrayed in the buildup to Wrestlemania, and he wasn't going to be happy with Shawn Michaels from that point on. We all know how that story ends up...
But it wasn't all Montreal Screwjobs. There was a time when the legitimate backstage tension between Bret and Shawn was good for the business, especially while the WWE accidentally found their new savior in a foul mouthed s.o.b. by the name of Steve Austin.
Bret had lost touch with the fans who were tired of his lame babyface schtick. It was time for a change. Bret joined with Owen, The Anvil, The Bulldog, and "Loose Cannon" Brian Pillman to form the NEW Hart Foundation, and while WCW was still dominating the ratings war, the Foundation's feuds were rebuilding interest in RAW. Eventually it would give birth to Austin vs. McMahon and Degeneration X, and the ball would be back in Vince's court.
Before that however, Bret's relationship with the WWE would self-destruct. Bret Hart was sitting on top of the WWE as the World Champion. However, his large contract was too much for Vince to handle, and Bret wasn't happy anyways. Bret wanted a change of scenery. It was time for him to move on.
The Survivor Series came from Canada that year, where Bret was still a crowd favorite. He wasn't comfortable with dropping the title to Shawn Michaels in his home country. We all know the story, as the WWE has revisited numerous times since.
Vince defended his actions by breaking kayfabe on Raw and essentially explaining how the business works. When you are a champion, and you are leaving a promotion, you do the right thing and lose the title. Hell, when you aren't a champion, and you are leaving a promotion, you lose a few matches. They weren't in Calgary, they were in Canada. That's like Hogan saying that he can't lose a match in the United States (which I guess arguably you could say he's pretty much stuck to over the past 20 plus years).
When Vince decided to take the title off Bret, he was doing what was best for himself and his employees. Had Vince let Bret leave as the WWE World Champion, and had a tournament or battle royal for a vacant title while Bret appeared on WCW TV as the man who never lost the title, I guarantee that WWE would not be the promotion left standing today, and regardless of what you think about the current WWE product, wrestling as a whole would be worse off. Could you imagine a WCW product in 2006 with no competition for ratings? I think we can all safely presume that it would be absolutely horrid.
Bret should have done business, point blank. A loss to Michaels in Canada would have done a lot less damage to the Hitman than the aftermath of the Montreal Screwjob did.
Bret Hart has essentially spent the past 9 years publicly crying about what happened at that Survivor Series. His chance to redeem himself in World Championship Wrestling is largely a flop, as he doesn't truly have a memorable match until after Owen Hart dies, and he meets Benoit at the Kemper Arena in a tribute match. WCW does nothing for Bret Hart, and Bret Hart does nothing for WCW.
As much as I criticize Bret, I don't do it without sympathy. In the time between the Montreal Screwjob and right now, both of his parents have passed, his brother died in a very public accident, his brother in law dies as well, his marriage falls apart, his family begins fighting amongst itself, and then Goldberg mule kicks Bret's head off, effectively ending Bret's career. If that's not enough, Bret then has a stroke.
It's impossible to not have compassion for Bret Hart, however it's hard to grant as much compassion as Bret consistently asks for. I mean essentially, everything mentioned in the last paragraph is something that Vince has blamed on Vince McMahon.
Bret Hart's story is tragic, as he has gone from the excellence of execution to a very cynical shell of his former self. Bret has made no apologies for constantly chastizing everything WWE related in his Calgary Sun column since his retirement.
He has attached the in ring work of Ric Flair and Shawn Michaels, two of the greatest in ring performers of all time, and two men who Bret himself has had some of his greatest matches with. He criticizes that their matches are all the same.
However it is Bret himself who is responsible for the popularization of the term, "five moves of doom." Watch the Bret Hart DVD and look for matches that don't reach their climax with a vertical suplex, Russian legsweep, backbreaker, elbowdrop from the second rope, and the Sharpshooter.
Then watch the extras on the DVD, and find out how Bret even learned the Sharpshooter. Made it up in the Dungeon? No. The so called "Excellence of Excecution" had to have Konnan (as Max Moon) teach him the sharpshooter. I was hooking the Scorpion Deathlock when I was 5 years old, and it was damn effective too. I made a lot of little kids tap.
If anything is more important to Bret than his pride, it's his legacy. The Bret Hart DVD only exists because Bret was willing to put his pride aside if it meant he could have control over his DVD.
Bret becomes wrestling's greatest hypocrite as he poses shaking hands with Vince McMahon, who he has publicly chastized for tearing apart his life and his family, so that he can reestablish to fans that he was important to the business.
Bret, no one ever disputed that you were important to the wrestling business. We all know that you mattered. You contributed some fantastic things. You created a legacy for yourself.
However, your continuing campaign to prove to fans that you were one of the greatest of all time is doing much more to tarnish your legacy than it is to build it. Bret was ok with appearing on TV for Vince McMahon so long as it placed him into the WWE Hall of Fame. He flat out stated that he would walk out if Shawn Michaels attended, and he refused to appear on the stage at Wrestlemania, which is the part of the induction especially for the fans to give their appreciation, but Bret did indeed cement his place in wrestling history.
Shortly afterward, he was inducted into an alternate Hall of Fame, and made sure to still get in a shot at Vince and the WWE Hall of Fame.
Everytime Bret Hart makes a veiled comment like that the WWE Hall of Fame means nothing, I don't picture Bret Hart standing on the second rope holding his title belt. I picture Bret Hart standing around the ring, breaking monitors.
Day by day, Bret Hart does more and more to make that image resound in my head at the mention of his name.
Recently Bret said he wouldn't mind appearing on WWE TV to unveil that the whole Montreal situation was a work, but he can't because of his stroke. If it was a work, it certainly didn't work out as Bret had planned, and he's done more than enough to let us know ever since 1997.
The wrestling community as a whole is more than over what happened at the 1997 Survivor Series. Shawn and Vince may not be, but at least when they relive it, they do it in the name of entertainment. Bret Hart relives that night as a spiteful old man, and I've yet to see anything positive come of it.
Bret carries the weight of everything that happened at that Survivor Series everyday with him. Due to his attitude and his column, the event is almost more identifiable with him than his in-ring work. Bret has indeed screwed Bret, and even if he doesn't have to accept fault for what happened that night, he does have to accept fault for the change in public opinion since his retirement.
It's time, Bret, to forgive and forget. It is time to fade from the limelight and let your past actions define how you will be remembered...
Golden Talent or Tarnished Legacy? Wrestling Legend or Wrestling Tragedy?
Only time will tell...
10 comments: on "How Hard Has Bret Screwed Bret?"
Simply amazing debut article Onslaught keep up the good work.
No, Max Moon is the current leader of LAX, hard to believe eh? Now THERES a gimmick whos time to return has come!
Konnan walked out on the WWE, and Paul Diamond became Max Moon.
So in essence, you are both correct.
Great article. I've been thinking about everything you wrote here for the last couple of months myself.
"Recently Bret said he wouldn't mind appearing on WWE TV to unveil that the whole Montreal situation was a work, but he can't because of his stroke."
Where? What next, Kanyon said so? Who the hell is Kanyon? His best friend? Does anyone has a tape recording or a video of Bret saying it was a work?
He said some times he would love to say it was a work but cant because it wasnt!?
I love when people tend to live on the screwjob and keep using it on columns to get attention and telling others to get over it!
On his DVD he didnt want to talk about it that much. He's said more than once that he is way over it(since his stroke),the wwe and guys like yourself should move on this subject, cause its old and boring.
You should listen to the latest RF video shoot interview with him, where you get the chance to learn some wrestling and watch skip questions related to this incident.
He only agreed to be apart of the DVD to prevent the thing for being about the screwjob and be a warrior alike DVD!
he said on numerous times he doesnt like the warrior but thinks the WWE handled him in an unproper way with that crappy DVDs that damaged specially the warrior fans!
He didn't want something like that to happen to him and his fans.
Hall fame 2006? WTF? Michaels was there and got caught on camera numerous times you should see it.
And he kept true to himself didn't shake hands with Hogan like he said he would do, and did sell out by showing at a wwe _wrestling_ event. That would help promote even more the wwe.
He even stayed at a diferent hotel and refused payment for the hall of fame show (yes all inductees get payed)!
The shots he takes on Flair arent about Flair making the same moves. Its about the way he does the same moves endless times in the same match specially without any inring psychology or proper order (something maybe you should learn a bit to).
Camon lets face it, flair can go back to a lock-up close to the finish of a match!
You dont need to have a big arsenal to produce a good or great match (he's the first one to admit it) or what? Do thing he doesnt know how to apply more suplexes and moves? Even 12ys do! Its not that hard. All you have to do is do the moves on a proper way and a way that makes sense! Flair never managed to do that. Not even in some of his greatest matches (against B.Windham) where you can move the match to the middle and still feel they are starting the match again.
Even wrestlings greatest do things complete out of porpose. Take benoit for example... doing 10 germans on austin completely taking any kind of credibility out of the gearman!
Guys like Lance Storm and some of the greatest teachers are the first ones to say that triple moves (germans, snaps and so on) are a big mistake and shouldnt be done!
As for Michaels he is a good athlete and spot wrestler, but makes to many mistakes. You can catch him endless times attacking the wrong leg or something. Thats worst than having the same comeback for the past 11 years (thats ok by me).
All in all you should move on and spend less time capitalizing on a subject with nothing new!
I'm always amazed at how people with media outlets, always try and grab a story and twist it as much as possible to get people to pay attention. But, that's alright....I understand the purpose of this blog. I'm contradicting myself by replying to it, but I feel like I must.
I won't lie, Bret Hart is my all-time favourite wrestler. I can legitimately say I've been a wrestling fan since 89-90. My two favourite wrestlers growing up were Bret Hart and Davey Boy Smith, and I remember watching Wembley Stadium on tape the very next day it happened without knowing the result. I was 10-11 years old, and that was one memory that has never left me. Even in my mid 20's, I get goosebumps watching that match.
Anyway
I'm always amazed at how guys like you....will be the first to criticize someone, yet the second a dirtsheet reports something, you are all over it with your own unique spin....just to get another couple of hits to your website.
Wrestling is subjective, always has been and always will be.
I usually take everything with a grain of salt, but after reading this column, I'm trying to wipe the smirk off my face as I am picturing you with a copy of PWTorch or some other dirt sheet in your hand. Writing down comments that dirtsheets have written and trying to pawn them off as your own. But, that's alright. I understand it.
Now, let's show everyone the true mean of a blog. Real opinions.
To me, Bret Hart is a true wrestler. He grew up in the business. He respects the business. He never "shot" on anyone in the ring. He made it a point to never hurt anyone in the ring. Infact, he did everything to prove himself in the ring, night after night. He wasn't a party animal, getting arrested for numerous drug busts. He wasn't a guy who was reputed to be difficult to work with. Infact, most wrestlers that have spoken about him, tell what a great guy he is and how great he was to work with.
Now, I'm always amused at the "Bret didn't draw well" remark. Infact, I snicker at that since he was beloved when I was growing up and had one of the biggest followings ever. He was quite possibly one of the biggest foreign draws ever as well. Let's keep something in mind....the WWF(E) has always been a hype machine and draws on more than just one wrestler. Let's look at some reasons the early 90's didn't draw so well.
1. Drugs. I'm sure if you were a "internet journalist" at the time, you'd be writing column after column about what an asshole Vince McMahon was for lying on the stand. You would probably try and convince people to boycot wrestling, because it's easy to get hits to your website that way. No matter. The negative stigma Vince received from the trial was very strong. Honestly, if Hulk Hogan was your hero and you just found out he was on steroids....what are you going to think?? Randy Savage?? Road Warriors?? Davey Boy Smith?? Ya, that's what I thought.
2. Gimmicks. Honestly, outside of the 'Taker what gimmick took off?? None. Lets think realistically about it. Duke Droese, Doink, Repo Man, Mantar, Bastion Booger, the Goon, Aldo Montoya, Bezerker, and many others were stinking up WWF rings during this time period. Honestly, if you were a fan for 20 years at this point....were you gonna watch that crap?? Even HHH didn't draw JACK until he dropped the Blue Blood gimmick....and now his ego trip is gonna land him the most World Titles in history. Austin, believe it or not....didn't lead the company. He was the biggest star in the world in the late 90's, but the Attitude era itself was much better than the New Generation. You had way more "legit" characters, so there was always someone new for Austin to face....and, not to mention Vince had to use a real life story with Bret to get himself over as a heel. (Which was smart)
3. Hulk Hogan. The cartoon audience was dead by then. The only reason Hogan was so hot in the first place, was because he was the first Billy Grahmae face character, being pushed to the MOON by Vince McMahon. No question he was a draw, but when you're the top star as Vince is taking over the World....it's quite easy to be that big if you look the part. Hogan didn't draw well in the 90's, until he turned heel. Fans weren't buying into him anymore.
Now, you can say what you want about Bret's character. But, here's the thing. He a legal right to refuse the finish to the match. A contractual right. He even said himself he could have taken it to court, but he didn't want to blow wrestling up in a court room. (Once again, respecting the business) Vince, of course....made sure he changed it. It would be the equivalent of me, working for the Canadian Government and I'm second in command to Stephen Harper. He gives me contractual reign to solve Afghanistan. I decide to pull out all of our troops and then he blows it up and makes me look like I did it. (Crude statment, but it's the same) I could take him to court, but's got all the power....what's the point??
Personally, you seem more like a mark to me....trying to get as much attention to yourself as possible. "Bret crys. Waaa. Bret whines. Waaa."
Get something new. Let the guy live his life.
shawn micheals should've lost the title to bret in 1997 on Wrestlemania. But instead he forfieted the title, saying he lost his smile (my ass).
Hey Missle:
Nice take....
Just an FYI...
we here at Tha O Show don't try to twist stories to increase our traffic. We report stories that come to us, we report rumors that come to us, and we print columns of varying opinion.
All we want is to offer an alternative voice to all of the monotony that's out there.
Tim Haugh is entitled to that opinion, no different than you are entitled to yours. I'm glad you left such a well written, intelligent response.
Fans like you understand the business.
Thanks for checkin us out.
Bigdaddy, thanks for letting me post. Sorry if I were a bit crude. My apologies if any offense were taken.
I love the business as much as you guys do. I'm a regular attendee of independants shows and have met Bret personally, amongest many others.
I'm glad you took the time to reply, I have more respect for this site now that I've read that. Thanks.
Congratulations! Great article!! I also think that the "Montreal Screwjob" was a work, just like Kanyon said.
Post a Comment